agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） vs DeepSeek Harness
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- DeepSeek Harness is growing faster: +16,095 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +255 for agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队）.
- Pick agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） for: chinese community edition with 277 AI agent personas across 20 departments and multi-agent orchestration. Pick DeepSeek Harness for: deepSeek Harness: Everything is a Plugin.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
a
agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队）open-source
Chinese community edition with 277 AI agent personas across 20 departments and multi-agent orchestration
D
DeepSeek Harnessopen-source
DeepSeek Harness: Everything is a Plugin.
Metrics
| agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） | DeepSeek Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21.0k | 242.1k |
| Star velocity /mo | 255 | 16.1k |
| Commits (90d) | 99 | 19.6k |
| Releases (6m) | 6 | 10 |
| Overall score | 0.6693970845352629 | 0.9504253212996784 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） or DeepSeek Harness?
- DeepSeek Harness has more GitHub stars (242,104 vs 21,039).
- Which is more actively developed, agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） or DeepSeek Harness?
- DeepSeek Harness had more commits in the last 90 days (19,632 vs 99).
- Should I use agency-agents 中文版（AI 智能体专家团队） or DeepSeek Harness?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.