Agent Development Kit (ADK) vs OmO
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- OmO is growing faster: +810 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +80 for Agent Development Kit (ADK).
- Pick Agent Development Kit (ADK) for: an open-source, code-first Python toolkit for building, evaluating, and deploying sophisticated AI agents. Pick OmO for: omO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Agent Development Kit (ADK)open-source
An open-source, code-first Python toolkit for building, evaluating, and deploying sophisticated AI agents with flexibility and control.
O
OmOopen-source
OmO: Just type "mass ulw" keyword with your prompt. Now you are the master of graph engineering.
Metrics
| Agent Development Kit (ADK) | OmO | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 21.7k | 69.8k |
| Star velocity /mo | 80 | 810 |
| Commits (90d) | 1.4k | 9.7k |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | 9.9M | 91.7K |
| Overall score | 0.7381542662312423 | 0.8973547831718989 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Agent Development Kit (ADK) or OmO?
- OmO has more GitHub stars (69,768 vs 21,696).
- Which is more actively developed, Agent Development Kit (ADK) or OmO?
- OmO had more commits in the last 90 days (9,692 vs 1,402).
- Should I use Agent Development Kit (ADK) or OmO?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.