Activepieces vs n8n-MCP
Side-by-side comparison of two AI agent tools
Short answer
- Activepieces is growing faster: +550 GitHub stars in the last 30 days vs +30 for n8n-MCP.
- Pick Activepieces for: open-source AI automation platform with TypeScript pieces available as MCP servers. Pick n8n-MCP for: a MCP for Claude Desktop / Claude Code / Windsurf / Cursor to build n8n workflows for you.
From GitHub data refreshed daily.
A
Activepiecesopen-source
Open-source AI automation platform with TypeScript pieces available as MCP servers
n
n8n-MCPopen-source
A MCP for Claude Desktop / Claude Code / Windsurf / Cursor to build n8n workflows for you
Metrics
| Activepieces | n8n-MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| Stars | 24.9k | 23.0k |
| Star velocity /mo | 550 | 30 |
| Commits (90d) | 1.0k | 137 |
| Releases (6m) | 10 | 10 |
| Downloads (30d, npm + PyPI) | — | 424.8K |
| Overall score | 0.8282648372470303 | 0.6117161512649488 |
FAQ
- Which is more popular, Activepieces or n8n-MCP?
- Activepieces has more GitHub stars (24,871 vs 23,032).
- Which is more actively developed, Activepieces or n8n-MCP?
- Activepieces had more commits in the last 90 days (1,048 vs 137).
- Should I use Activepieces or n8n-MCP?
- Compare their capabilities, limitations and "best for" notes above. Both are open source, so trying each on a small task is the fastest way to decide.